Tuesday, 26 May 2009

Congress and Obama trying to use UN treaty to take your rights as parents away

No one tells us how to raise our kids. The reason the U.S. Government wants to do these things as treaties is because they over-ride state and federal constitutions and law.

Fight for your god given rights! Mike Huckabee and constitutional lawyer Michael Farris discuss a UN treaty the US senate is going to vote on that would give the UN rights to control how American parents raise their children.

Please take the time to watch this and listen carefully. In the broadcast they talk about a child that complained that his parents took him to church too many days a week. A 13 year old was sexually active and I can't believe what they did!!! What happened will infuriate you! Is this where we are headed? I am going to watch some more of the video clips to see what else is in these clips. May God have mercy on us!!!!

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=GmdoGoCvsW0

You must contact your Senators in CONgress to tell them you do not want this treaty ratified. You are the only one that should have say so over your kids. Period.

We must act now to stop this treaty, so please Call 1-877-851-6437 toll free or 1-202-225-3121 toll. Names of Senate Judiciary members are posted at www.truthtellers.org. The Congressional switchboard: 866-340-9281

Technorati Tags: parental right congress un treaty steals children from parents

Posted by actanonverba at 7:32 PM in What next from the nefarious gang 535 in DC

Responses (0)

Fifty Years of Math 1957 - 2009

Thinking the border with mexico looks better with a fence

Found this on the infotubes recently. If not for the sad truth in it, my laughter would be resounding.

Do we want the same lawlessness found in Mexico here in the U.S.?

Last week I purchased a burger at Burger King for $1.58. The counter girl took my $ 2 and I was digging for my change when I pulled 8 cents from my pocket and gave it to her. She stood there, holding the nickel and 3 pennies, while looking at the screen on her register. I sensed her discomfort and tried to tell her to just give me two quarters , but she hailed the manager for help. While he tried to explain the transaction to her, she stood there and cried. Why do I tell you this? Because of the evolution in teaching math since the 1950s:

1. Teaching Math In 1950s

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of
production is 4/5 of the price. What is his profit ?

2. Teaching Math In 1960s

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of
production is 4/5 of the price, or $80. What is his profit?

3. Teaching Math In 1970s

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of
production is $80. Did he make a profit?

4. Teaching Math In 1980s

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of
production is $80 and his profit is $20. Your assignment:
Underline the number 20.

5. Teaching Math In 1990s

A logger cuts down a beautiful forest because he is selfish
and inconsiderate and cares nothing for the habitat of
animals or the preservation of our woodlands. He does this
so he can make a profit of $20. What do you think of this
way of making a living? Topic for class participation after
answering the question: How did the birds and squirrels feel
as the logger cut down their homes? (There are no wrong
answers, and if you feel like crying, it's ok. )

6. Teaching Math In 2009

Un hachero vende una carretada de maderapara $100. El costo
de la producciones es $80. Cuanto dinero ha hecho?

And that's just the math.

Forget the rest.

Technorati Tags: Fifty Years of Math 1957 - 2009

Posted by actanonverba at 8:10 AM in Eye on Reform Immigration Policy Without Amnesty

Responses (0)

Tuesday, 19 May 2009

Day 2,762 of The Continuing Saga of America under Despotic Rule by Patriot Act

telling the government to kiss my ass one tax dollar at a time Helping Sentiant out a little with this. We as citizens must highlight these egregious acts against our citizens. We must protest in any way possible the continuation of the Patriot Act and any such act of its kind.

As most of you know Sentiant has been writing about Ashton Lundeby here and here, a 16 year old boy who was arrested under the auspices of the Patriot Act. Ashton has still not been seen by his parents, nor has he been given access to a lawyer. And to top things off the government won't confirm he was arrested under the jurisdiction of the Patriot Act. You scoundrels!

Catch the original TV broadcast about Ashton Lundeby. And for an Update, check out "New information on Patriot Act detention of Ashton Lundeby"

Technorati Tags: The Continuing Saga of America under Despotic Rule for 2 762 days Patriot Act Unlawful detainment

Posted by actanonverba at 5:05 AM in What next from the nefarious gang 535 in DC

Responses (0)

Thursday, 14 May 2009

Mexico praises US and Obama for letting the rest of the H1N1 horses escape the barn

I love bacon, but hate the swine in washington. Sigh... God help us if this is the logic of our elected leaders.

Usurper Obama forcefully rejected the idea of closing the border, despite arguments from conservative talk show hosts that swine flu showed immigration from Mexico was a threat.

Close the border! The Obama administration cast the decision as a recognition of reality: Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said sealing the border would be extremely costly and pointless since the virus was already in the United States. Obama likened the idea to "closing the barn door after the horses are out."

I have two points of contention with the thinking of both Obama and Napolitano.

First, Napolitano says it will be too expensive. Compared to spending 3 trillion dollars from the public teat on banks and businesses with failed business models?

Second, Obama says is like closing the barn door after the horses are out. So we should let more horses escape? But the begs the question, why were the barn doors open in the first place?

Arrgh, do you folk actually go to bed at night and think you will wake up smarter?

_____________________________

Alan Keyes is a very smart man. I would vote for him in a heartbeat. He said the following:
"Two Trillion dollars, think about that. "You" don't have that kind of money"
"(They) are presuming a bankrupt nation can save a bankrupt banking system"
"We're all acting like the laws of economics have been repealed"
"It will lead to our collapse, I am certain of that"
I am too.

Technorati Tags: Mexico praises US and Obama for letting the rest of the H1N1 horses escape the barn

Posted by actanonverba at 2:47 AM in Pretend President Obama

Responses (0)

Wednesday, 6 May 2009

Obama The Usurper sends more American Money Overseas

While his (sic...) country crumbles in economic despair, the Pretend President is proposing to solve all the medical woes of other countries to the tune of $63 Billion U.S. tax-payer dollars over the next 6 years. This while his own people can barely put butter on their tables let alone bread. One can only wonder if he will ask Step-N-Fetch Hillary to draft a Universal Health Care plan for all of us which is an even scarier prospect considering she wants to force it down your soon to be comrade throat. Good Job American Sheeple, you voted for these wolves in sheeps clothing, you got exactly what you voted for... pocket change.

_____________________

"Doing a good deed is like wetting your pants; every one can see the results, but only you can feel the warmth."

Technorati Tags: Obama The Usurper sends more American Money Overseas

Posted by actanonverba at 5:15 AM in The New American Robbin' da Hood

Responses (0)

American Government: Social Concensus or Constitutional Republic?

This entry asks the important question, is the United States of America a nation ruled by law or a nation ruled by popular vote? In his conservative critical article about the ongoing efforts of a few good Americans to force the Pretend President to release his vault birth certificate, David Horowitz underscored the liberal left's socialist thinking and ultimately their ambition for the last 40 years. That being to take our great society from a constitutional republic to a society vulnerable to the whims and fancy of the U.S. body politic, a change that history has proven over and over will lead to the collapse of our great society as it did to others in the past that made the same err. Mr. Horowitz's article faux pas could find no other avenue of discourse than to call those of us who support this endeavor, "deranged" and then further insults our fore-fathers by saying society is organic, while questioning the meaning of the tenets of our great constitution, implying that it should morph with the mood of the public. Horowitz totally fails to recognize that this same Constitution has led our society thru 200 years of solid governance and jurisprudence which made us stable and prosperous when most other countries found themselves beset by turmoil while collapsing from lack of integrity, bloated fiscal policy and a disrespect for the very lives that constitute their oft repressed society.

We should find this lack of respect for our nations founding charter as no surprise in light of Horowitz's upbringing, the son of Marxist's and school teachers in Queens, New York. Its hard to become un-indoctrinated from parental influence, especially such lofty ideas as the benefits of the brotherhood of man and the classless society advances so successfully implemented in Russia and China.

Horowitz even has the audacity to ask if our good crusaders are willing to deny the will of 64 million voters by appealing to five Supreme Court Justices regards Obama's less than forthcoming birth information. To this I would ask what about the other 240 million members of the population? Are we to allow their lives to be impacted by a man, who is unwilling to abide by the very constitution he is sworn to uphold, even in the seemingly simple chore of proving legitimate citizenship? If he is unwilling to perform this very simple directive, then what other aspect of this wonderous charter are left open to his interpretation?

Perhaps Mr. Horowitz, we should vote to send you and your Marxist Tribe back to China or Russia, and let you experience first hand the society you and the Usurper so insidiously seek.

______________

"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship." ~ Alexander Tytler

Technorati Tags: American Government: Social Concensus or Constitutional Republic?

Posted by actanonverba at 4:18 AM in Is this what our founding fathers intended?

Responses (0)

Tuesday, 5 May 2009

Has the Obama White House Broken the Law?

I was reading a post over on Michelle Malkin's website entitled, "Chrysler and Coercion" which detailed how the Obama administration has basically strong-armed contractually bound investors and lien holders into accepting the new terms of the Chrysler bailout.

It seems to me these folks would have petition for relief or injunction against the White House for unconscionability of the contract, that is it is unconscionable to force someone to contract under threat, coercion, or duress and unconscionability can be grounds to void a contract.

I find it entertaining that folks are surprised by this, when one considers that the Usurper-in-Chief won't even obey the simple tenets of our fine Constitution.

Technorati Tags: obama coerces chrysler lenders and investors

Posted by actanonverba at 1:17 AM in Winning the War on Truthful Information

Responses (0)

Saturday, 2 May 2009

Have the Tea Parties been De-activated? How to Demobilize a Movement

How would a government agent go about fullfilling his Master's command to stop the American public from carrying through with the intent of the Tea Parties? I found the following entry over on Opposing Digits which provides just the answer to this dilemma for our agent.

Start a petition for the cause. Even if you submit the petition to it's target: it's still just a piece of paper or digital (fudgeable) record. The petitioners are left satiated feeling they did what they could. When people start to catch on to it's ineffectiveness, move to the next level by having a phone campaign. When people realize it's ineffective as well (with answering machines, turning the phone off, having secretary deal) then take it to the streets.

Organize it by calling people armchair activists, and complain about people never doing anything. Be sure to plant people like a dumbass with a megaphone to draw negative attention to your cause, or a person to throw something at the police so they can attack the crowd and take down names and intimidate / scare 'would be' activists. The idiot with the megaphone stays within boundaries and keeps the general crowd controlled so they don't overtake the public servants (mercenaries). People in large groups are followers in general, if a leader breaks ranks they'll be followed. With the megaphone: you control who their perceived leader is.

Make people think that you or your group are the only ones people can trust, then mix the truth with nonsense like:

Introduce religion that teaches that God put 'the powers that be into' place, to obey the laws, to support a group of people blindly, to turn the other cheek, etc.

Discourage. Tell people that approach you about an issue that they can't change it. Things are just the way they are.

Organize a posse of online disinformationists. (kinda like House Negros)

Divert attention by creating bigger stories. -Nothing like a little sensationalized media like the recent drunk astronauts who had a 12 hour no drink policy, with no blood alchohol test results even mentioned. Some distract from the real enemy by pretending to dig deeper like exposing the Jesuit Order, or Satan.

Promote mainstream outlets as good places for people to go. They're already good at giving people just enough to keep their attention while keeping them in the dark and demobilized.

Divide and Conquer. Convince your followers that they are enlightened, and others are sheeple. Tell them (your followers) that they think for themselves -lol! Their condescending attitudes and name calling will stifle any ground they could make in representing their (your) truths. Be sure to have mixed those truths with some nonsense they can tout as facts.