Sunday, 6 December 2009

Vaccine Induced Autism: Early Intervention or Real Science Based Medicine?

Share

We know big pharma caused autism, we just don't know how, until now...While we wait for doctors to finally own up to the travesty that is the current vaccine industry and stop hiding behind the CDC and WHO corporatocracy, real science based medical research (unlike the 'science' being promoted by these guys) is being conducted by people who actually care about the citizens and most especially the children of America.

 

During its research into the application of neuroscience in business, a New Jersey based think tank, The Center for Modeling Optimal Outcomes®, LLC (The Center) made an inadvertent and amazing discovery.

Autism saddens me... all the suffering children.The Center examined the neuroscientific dynamics of logic and emotion in decision making while researching neuroscience in business. They found unique corollary relationships between various brain chemicals (neurohormones, neurotransmitters, etc.). This apparent pattern led to a new path of research for the team outside of business.

Through the application of their model, it became apparent that autism is an outcome of several variables that, when the homeostatic relationship of each one is disrupted, a "perfect storm" scenario results in autism. The application of the model identified several of the variables that account for why boys have a 4 to 1 ratio of instances over girls as well as why not every boy is affected.


While the scientific community will have to validate The Center's findings, the model for assessing homeostatic relationships indicates the "trigger" behind autism is an imbalance between a pair of amino acid neurotransmitters; glutamate and glycine.

Autism was one of most difficult illnesses The Center had attempted to analyze. If it hadn't been for so many parents insisting that vaccines were responsible for the condition, we might never have found the fact that the stabilizer in MMR and a few other vaccines is hydrolyzed gelatin; a substance that is approximately 21% glycine. It appears that, based on readily verifiable science, the use of that form of glycine triggers an imbalance between the amino acid neurotransmitters responsible for the absorption rate of certain classes of cells throughout the body.

Let's hope this new find withstands the rigorous scientific verification it deserves.  1 in 150 children in America deserve to know why they have Autism.

 

Technorati Tags:

Posted by actanonverba at 2:45 AM in Real Science Based Medicine
Responses (0)

Sunday, 8 November 2009

Does Sugar on a Wound Help it Heal Faster?

Share

I've never pooh poohed ancient wisdom...

Rubbing sugar into wounds could cure painful infections including bedsores, research shows.  The traditional African remedy is being trialled in British hospitals after a study led by a senior nurse raised in Zimbabwe.

According to Moses Murandu, sugar protects wounds from infection and promotes faster healing.  As a child he watched his father put crushed sugar cane on villagers' wounds and grew up thinking it was a widely used treatment.

When he moved to England he was surprised to find doctors did not use it.

His six-month study involved 21 patients at Selly Oak Hospital in Birmingham whose wounds had not responded to conventional treatment.

It showed that pouring granulated sugar on to bed sores, leg ulcers or amputations before dressing can kill the bacteria that prevents healing and causes chronic pain.

Bacteria need water to survive but sugar draws water from the wound into the dressing.

Mr Murandu, 43, believes the technique, which was passed down from his great-grandfather, could save the NHS billions.

'The village where I grew up was very small and we didn't have a great deal of medicine available to us,' he said.

'Doctors here tend to forget the traditional medicines that have been working for thousands of years.'

Bosses at the Selly Oak Hospital in Birmingham have been so impressed that he has been awarded £25,000 to treat up to 100 more patients with sugar.

My hat goes off to Mr. Murandu for re-introducing modern British medicine to age old medicinal practices.

The United States knew about sugar's bacterial growth inhibition properties as far back as 1983 when the NIH conducted a study with positive results (I say 1983 if you go by the basis that it takes a government study to make a determination official...sic).

Now why do you think our modern, science based medicine hasn't used this to combat infections?  Maybe it's not sciency (awk!) enough?  or, maybe their just ain't enough money in sugar... (awk! awk!)

It was nice to note that the guys over at Science-Based Medicine Blog were talking about this and collodial silver, which as a chemist I've always known of its use as an antiseptic and was aware of its other medicinal properties.

Perhaps it's time to take a good look at ancient medicine...

Ya think?

 

Technorati Tags:

Posted by actanonverba at 11:06 PM in Real Science Based Medicine
Responses (0)
Our Sponsors:

 

« March »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   
       

My site was nominated for Best Blog of All Time!
My site was nominated for Best Blogging Host!
My site was nominated for Best Political Blog!